Veterinary pathology and peer review

G. H. Cantor, J. L. Caswell, J. W. Crissman, D. M. Gillette, D. E. Gunson, Harm HogenEsch, M. Kiupel, M. G. Mense, M. A. Miller, L. J. Rush, J. A. St. Leger, T. R. Schoeb, R. S. Sellers, R. C. Sills, D. E. Swayne, H. C. Thomas, J. M. Ward, C. L. Alden

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

With these guidelines, reviewing can be a fascinating way to engage in the progress of scientific knowledge. As one reviewer wrote, "The best reviewers also appreciate the opportunity for teaching and find reviewing a good paper as informative and exhilarating as participating in an inspiring work-in-progress research seminar. The quality of their reviews, furthermore, is importantly contagious."3 The editorial staff of Veterinary Pathology believes that any and all ACVP members should agree, when requested, to review papers on topics within their realm of expertise as a service to the membership. Only by broad support from the membership will our journal achieve the highest impact possible. Veterinary Pathology is grateful to and thanks the many excellent scientific reviewers who have made Veterinary Pathology such a high-quality journal. We hope to continue and grow this fine tradition by recruiting and mentoring additional talented reviewers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)173-175
Number of pages3
JournalVeterinary Pathology
Volume46
Issue number2
StatePublished - Mar 2009

Fingerprint

Veterinary Pathology
Peer Review
peers
mentoring
Teaching
Guidelines
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • veterinary(all)

Cite this

Cantor, G. H., Caswell, J. L., Crissman, J. W., Gillette, D. M., Gunson, D. E., HogenEsch, H., ... Alden, C. L. (2009). Veterinary pathology and peer review. Veterinary Pathology, 46(2), 173-175.

Veterinary pathology and peer review. / Cantor, G. H.; Caswell, J. L.; Crissman, J. W.; Gillette, D. M.; Gunson, D. E.; HogenEsch, Harm; Kiupel, M.; Mense, M. G.; Miller, M. A.; Rush, L. J.; St. Leger, J. A.; Schoeb, T. R.; Sellers, R. S.; Sills, R. C.; Swayne, D. E.; Thomas, H. C.; Ward, J. M.; Alden, C. L.

In: Veterinary Pathology, Vol. 46, No. 2, 03.2009, p. 173-175.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Cantor, GH, Caswell, JL, Crissman, JW, Gillette, DM, Gunson, DE, HogenEsch, H, Kiupel, M, Mense, MG, Miller, MA, Rush, LJ, St. Leger, JA, Schoeb, TR, Sellers, RS, Sills, RC, Swayne, DE, Thomas, HC, Ward, JM & Alden, CL 2009, 'Veterinary pathology and peer review', Veterinary Pathology, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 173-175.
Cantor GH, Caswell JL, Crissman JW, Gillette DM, Gunson DE, HogenEsch H et al. Veterinary pathology and peer review. Veterinary Pathology. 2009 Mar;46(2):173-175.
Cantor, G. H. ; Caswell, J. L. ; Crissman, J. W. ; Gillette, D. M. ; Gunson, D. E. ; HogenEsch, Harm ; Kiupel, M. ; Mense, M. G. ; Miller, M. A. ; Rush, L. J. ; St. Leger, J. A. ; Schoeb, T. R. ; Sellers, R. S. ; Sills, R. C. ; Swayne, D. E. ; Thomas, H. C. ; Ward, J. M. ; Alden, C. L. / Veterinary pathology and peer review. In: Veterinary Pathology. 2009 ; Vol. 46, No. 2. pp. 173-175.
@article{726f700b0fb247e9a46861464986359d,
title = "Veterinary pathology and peer review",
abstract = "With these guidelines, reviewing can be a fascinating way to engage in the progress of scientific knowledge. As one reviewer wrote, {"}The best reviewers also appreciate the opportunity for teaching and find reviewing a good paper as informative and exhilarating as participating in an inspiring work-in-progress research seminar. The quality of their reviews, furthermore, is importantly contagious.{"}3 The editorial staff of Veterinary Pathology believes that any and all ACVP members should agree, when requested, to review papers on topics within their realm of expertise as a service to the membership. Only by broad support from the membership will our journal achieve the highest impact possible. Veterinary Pathology is grateful to and thanks the many excellent scientific reviewers who have made Veterinary Pathology such a high-quality journal. We hope to continue and grow this fine tradition by recruiting and mentoring additional talented reviewers.",
author = "Cantor, {G. H.} and Caswell, {J. L.} and Crissman, {J. W.} and Gillette, {D. M.} and Gunson, {D. E.} and Harm HogenEsch and M. Kiupel and Mense, {M. G.} and Miller, {M. A.} and Rush, {L. J.} and {St. Leger}, {J. A.} and Schoeb, {T. R.} and Sellers, {R. S.} and Sills, {R. C.} and Swayne, {D. E.} and Thomas, {H. C.} and Ward, {J. M.} and Alden, {C. L.}",
year = "2009",
month = "3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "46",
pages = "173--175",
journal = "Veterinary Pathology",
issn = "0300-9858",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Veterinary pathology and peer review

AU - Cantor, G. H.

AU - Caswell, J. L.

AU - Crissman, J. W.

AU - Gillette, D. M.

AU - Gunson, D. E.

AU - HogenEsch, Harm

AU - Kiupel, M.

AU - Mense, M. G.

AU - Miller, M. A.

AU - Rush, L. J.

AU - St. Leger, J. A.

AU - Schoeb, T. R.

AU - Sellers, R. S.

AU - Sills, R. C.

AU - Swayne, D. E.

AU - Thomas, H. C.

AU - Ward, J. M.

AU - Alden, C. L.

PY - 2009/3

Y1 - 2009/3

N2 - With these guidelines, reviewing can be a fascinating way to engage in the progress of scientific knowledge. As one reviewer wrote, "The best reviewers also appreciate the opportunity for teaching and find reviewing a good paper as informative and exhilarating as participating in an inspiring work-in-progress research seminar. The quality of their reviews, furthermore, is importantly contagious."3 The editorial staff of Veterinary Pathology believes that any and all ACVP members should agree, when requested, to review papers on topics within their realm of expertise as a service to the membership. Only by broad support from the membership will our journal achieve the highest impact possible. Veterinary Pathology is grateful to and thanks the many excellent scientific reviewers who have made Veterinary Pathology such a high-quality journal. We hope to continue and grow this fine tradition by recruiting and mentoring additional talented reviewers.

AB - With these guidelines, reviewing can be a fascinating way to engage in the progress of scientific knowledge. As one reviewer wrote, "The best reviewers also appreciate the opportunity for teaching and find reviewing a good paper as informative and exhilarating as participating in an inspiring work-in-progress research seminar. The quality of their reviews, furthermore, is importantly contagious."3 The editorial staff of Veterinary Pathology believes that any and all ACVP members should agree, when requested, to review papers on topics within their realm of expertise as a service to the membership. Only by broad support from the membership will our journal achieve the highest impact possible. Veterinary Pathology is grateful to and thanks the many excellent scientific reviewers who have made Veterinary Pathology such a high-quality journal. We hope to continue and grow this fine tradition by recruiting and mentoring additional talented reviewers.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67650931344&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67650931344&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Review article

VL - 46

SP - 173

EP - 175

JO - Veterinary Pathology

JF - Veterinary Pathology

SN - 0300-9858

IS - 2

ER -