Views of institutional leaders on maintaining humanism in today's practice

Mary Ann C. Gilligan, Lars G. Osterberg, Elizabeth A. Rider, Arthur R. Derse, Amy B. Weil, Debra Litzelman, Dana W. Dunne, Janet P. Hafler, Margaret Plews-Ogan, Richard Frankel, William T. Branch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: To explore leadership perspectives on how to maintain high quality efficient care that is also person-centered and humanistic. Methods: The authors interviewed and collected narrative transcripts from a convenience sample of 32 institutional healthcare leaders at seven U.S. medical schools. The institutional leaders were asked to identify factors that either promoted or inhibited humanistic practice. A subset of authors used the constant comparative method to perform qualitative analysis of the interview transcripts. They reached thematic saturation by consensus on the major themes and illustrative examples after six conference calls. Results: Institutional healthcare leaders supported vision statements, policies, organized educational and faculty development programs, role modeling including their own, and recognition of informal acts of kindness to promote and maintain humanistic patient-care. These measures were described individually rather than as components of a coordinated plan. Few healthcare leaders mentioned plans for organizational or systems changes to promote humanistic clinician-patient relationships. Conclusions: Institutional leaders assisted clinicians in dealing with stressful practices in beneficial ways but fell short of envisaging systems approaches that improve practice organization to encourage humanistic care. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: To preserve humanistic care requires system changes as well as programs to enhance skills and foster humanistic values and attitudes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalPatient Education and Counseling
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Humanism
Delivery of Health Care
Quality of Health Care
Medical Schools
Consensus
Patient Care
Organizations
Interviews
Practice (Psychology)

Keywords

  • Burnout
  • Compassionate healthcare
  • Faculty development
  • Humanism
  • Leadership
  • Organizational culture
  • Values

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Gilligan, M. A. C., Osterberg, L. G., Rider, E. A., Derse, A. R., Weil, A. B., Litzelman, D., ... Branch, W. T. (2019). Views of institutional leaders on maintaining humanism in today's practice. Patient Education and Counseling. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2019.04.025

Views of institutional leaders on maintaining humanism in today's practice. / Gilligan, Mary Ann C.; Osterberg, Lars G.; Rider, Elizabeth A.; Derse, Arthur R.; Weil, Amy B.; Litzelman, Debra; Dunne, Dana W.; Hafler, Janet P.; Plews-Ogan, Margaret; Frankel, Richard; Branch, William T.

In: Patient Education and Counseling, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gilligan, MAC, Osterberg, LG, Rider, EA, Derse, AR, Weil, AB, Litzelman, D, Dunne, DW, Hafler, JP, Plews-Ogan, M, Frankel, R & Branch, WT 2019, 'Views of institutional leaders on maintaining humanism in today's practice', Patient Education and Counseling. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2019.04.025
Gilligan, Mary Ann C. ; Osterberg, Lars G. ; Rider, Elizabeth A. ; Derse, Arthur R. ; Weil, Amy B. ; Litzelman, Debra ; Dunne, Dana W. ; Hafler, Janet P. ; Plews-Ogan, Margaret ; Frankel, Richard ; Branch, William T. / Views of institutional leaders on maintaining humanism in today's practice. In: Patient Education and Counseling. 2019.
@article{96166ae84496497eae95d23ac0507b6b,
title = "Views of institutional leaders on maintaining humanism in today's practice",
abstract = "Objective: To explore leadership perspectives on how to maintain high quality efficient care that is also person-centered and humanistic. Methods: The authors interviewed and collected narrative transcripts from a convenience sample of 32 institutional healthcare leaders at seven U.S. medical schools. The institutional leaders were asked to identify factors that either promoted or inhibited humanistic practice. A subset of authors used the constant comparative method to perform qualitative analysis of the interview transcripts. They reached thematic saturation by consensus on the major themes and illustrative examples after six conference calls. Results: Institutional healthcare leaders supported vision statements, policies, organized educational and faculty development programs, role modeling including their own, and recognition of informal acts of kindness to promote and maintain humanistic patient-care. These measures were described individually rather than as components of a coordinated plan. Few healthcare leaders mentioned plans for organizational or systems changes to promote humanistic clinician-patient relationships. Conclusions: Institutional leaders assisted clinicians in dealing with stressful practices in beneficial ways but fell short of envisaging systems approaches that improve practice organization to encourage humanistic care. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: To preserve humanistic care requires system changes as well as programs to enhance skills and foster humanistic values and attitudes.",
keywords = "Burnout, Compassionate healthcare, Faculty development, Humanism, Leadership, Organizational culture, Values",
author = "Gilligan, {Mary Ann C.} and Osterberg, {Lars G.} and Rider, {Elizabeth A.} and Derse, {Arthur R.} and Weil, {Amy B.} and Debra Litzelman and Dunne, {Dana W.} and Hafler, {Janet P.} and Margaret Plews-Ogan and Richard Frankel and Branch, {William T.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.pec.2019.04.025",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Patient Education and Counseling",
issn = "0738-3991",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Views of institutional leaders on maintaining humanism in today's practice

AU - Gilligan, Mary Ann C.

AU - Osterberg, Lars G.

AU - Rider, Elizabeth A.

AU - Derse, Arthur R.

AU - Weil, Amy B.

AU - Litzelman, Debra

AU - Dunne, Dana W.

AU - Hafler, Janet P.

AU - Plews-Ogan, Margaret

AU - Frankel, Richard

AU - Branch, William T.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Objective: To explore leadership perspectives on how to maintain high quality efficient care that is also person-centered and humanistic. Methods: The authors interviewed and collected narrative transcripts from a convenience sample of 32 institutional healthcare leaders at seven U.S. medical schools. The institutional leaders were asked to identify factors that either promoted or inhibited humanistic practice. A subset of authors used the constant comparative method to perform qualitative analysis of the interview transcripts. They reached thematic saturation by consensus on the major themes and illustrative examples after six conference calls. Results: Institutional healthcare leaders supported vision statements, policies, organized educational and faculty development programs, role modeling including their own, and recognition of informal acts of kindness to promote and maintain humanistic patient-care. These measures were described individually rather than as components of a coordinated plan. Few healthcare leaders mentioned plans for organizational or systems changes to promote humanistic clinician-patient relationships. Conclusions: Institutional leaders assisted clinicians in dealing with stressful practices in beneficial ways but fell short of envisaging systems approaches that improve practice organization to encourage humanistic care. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: To preserve humanistic care requires system changes as well as programs to enhance skills and foster humanistic values and attitudes.

AB - Objective: To explore leadership perspectives on how to maintain high quality efficient care that is also person-centered and humanistic. Methods: The authors interviewed and collected narrative transcripts from a convenience sample of 32 institutional healthcare leaders at seven U.S. medical schools. The institutional leaders were asked to identify factors that either promoted or inhibited humanistic practice. A subset of authors used the constant comparative method to perform qualitative analysis of the interview transcripts. They reached thematic saturation by consensus on the major themes and illustrative examples after six conference calls. Results: Institutional healthcare leaders supported vision statements, policies, organized educational and faculty development programs, role modeling including their own, and recognition of informal acts of kindness to promote and maintain humanistic patient-care. These measures were described individually rather than as components of a coordinated plan. Few healthcare leaders mentioned plans for organizational or systems changes to promote humanistic clinician-patient relationships. Conclusions: Institutional leaders assisted clinicians in dealing with stressful practices in beneficial ways but fell short of envisaging systems approaches that improve practice organization to encourage humanistic care. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: To preserve humanistic care requires system changes as well as programs to enhance skills and foster humanistic values and attitudes.

KW - Burnout

KW - Compassionate healthcare

KW - Faculty development

KW - Humanism

KW - Leadership

KW - Organizational culture

KW - Values

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065518387&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065518387&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.pec.2019.04.025

DO - 10.1016/j.pec.2019.04.025

M3 - Article

C2 - 31097330

AN - SCOPUS:85065518387

JO - Patient Education and Counseling

JF - Patient Education and Counseling

SN - 0738-3991

ER -