Vision standards for driving in Canada and the United States. A review for the Canadian ophthalmological society

E. J. Casson, L. Racette

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We review the vision requirements for driving with the goal of revising current Canadian Ophthalmological Society (COS) recommendations for vision standards for driving. The report comprises two sections. In the first section we report the results of a survey of transportation authorities in Canada and the United States conducted on behalf of the COS to determine the current standards and medical review procedures. The results suggest that although the standards in Canada are more consistent than those in the United States, few of the standards in either country are evidence-based. In the second section we review the recent literature on visual function and driving. We conclude from this review that adequate contrast sensitivity is as important as, if not more important than, good visual acuity for driving and that there is little evidence to support a monocular standard for acuity, contrast sensitivity or visual field. Although there is evidence that the extent of a visual field defect is related to the ability to perform driving tasks, there is little evidence to suggest a relation between the location of the visual field defect and fitness to drive.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)192-203
Number of pages12
JournalCanadian Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume35
Issue number4
StatePublished - 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Canada
Visual Fields
Contrast Sensitivity
Aptitude
Visual Acuity

Keywords

  • Contrast sensitivity
  • Driving
  • Vision standards
  • Visual acuity
  • Visual field

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Vision standards for driving in Canada and the United States. A review for the Canadian ophthalmological society. / Casson, E. J.; Racette, L.

In: Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology, Vol. 35, No. 4, 2000, p. 192-203.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{305992f9b679416cb41e57a654eb2f52,
title = "Vision standards for driving in Canada and the United States. A review for the Canadian ophthalmological society",
abstract = "We review the vision requirements for driving with the goal of revising current Canadian Ophthalmological Society (COS) recommendations for vision standards for driving. The report comprises two sections. In the first section we report the results of a survey of transportation authorities in Canada and the United States conducted on behalf of the COS to determine the current standards and medical review procedures. The results suggest that although the standards in Canada are more consistent than those in the United States, few of the standards in either country are evidence-based. In the second section we review the recent literature on visual function and driving. We conclude from this review that adequate contrast sensitivity is as important as, if not more important than, good visual acuity for driving and that there is little evidence to support a monocular standard for acuity, contrast sensitivity or visual field. Although there is evidence that the extent of a visual field defect is related to the ability to perform driving tasks, there is little evidence to suggest a relation between the location of the visual field defect and fitness to drive.",
keywords = "Contrast sensitivity, Driving, Vision standards, Visual acuity, Visual field",
author = "Casson, {E. J.} and L. Racette",
year = "2000",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "192--203",
journal = "Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology",
issn = "0008-4182",
publisher = "Canadian Ophthalmological Society",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Vision standards for driving in Canada and the United States. A review for the Canadian ophthalmological society

AU - Casson, E. J.

AU - Racette, L.

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - We review the vision requirements for driving with the goal of revising current Canadian Ophthalmological Society (COS) recommendations for vision standards for driving. The report comprises two sections. In the first section we report the results of a survey of transportation authorities in Canada and the United States conducted on behalf of the COS to determine the current standards and medical review procedures. The results suggest that although the standards in Canada are more consistent than those in the United States, few of the standards in either country are evidence-based. In the second section we review the recent literature on visual function and driving. We conclude from this review that adequate contrast sensitivity is as important as, if not more important than, good visual acuity for driving and that there is little evidence to support a monocular standard for acuity, contrast sensitivity or visual field. Although there is evidence that the extent of a visual field defect is related to the ability to perform driving tasks, there is little evidence to suggest a relation between the location of the visual field defect and fitness to drive.

AB - We review the vision requirements for driving with the goal of revising current Canadian Ophthalmological Society (COS) recommendations for vision standards for driving. The report comprises two sections. In the first section we report the results of a survey of transportation authorities in Canada and the United States conducted on behalf of the COS to determine the current standards and medical review procedures. The results suggest that although the standards in Canada are more consistent than those in the United States, few of the standards in either country are evidence-based. In the second section we review the recent literature on visual function and driving. We conclude from this review that adequate contrast sensitivity is as important as, if not more important than, good visual acuity for driving and that there is little evidence to support a monocular standard for acuity, contrast sensitivity or visual field. Although there is evidence that the extent of a visual field defect is related to the ability to perform driving tasks, there is little evidence to suggest a relation between the location of the visual field defect and fitness to drive.

KW - Contrast sensitivity

KW - Driving

KW - Vision standards

KW - Visual acuity

KW - Visual field

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033752915&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033752915&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 10900516

AN - SCOPUS:0033752915

VL - 35

SP - 192

EP - 203

JO - Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology

JF - Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology

SN - 0008-4182

IS - 4

ER -