Vocational services for traumatic brain injury: Treatment definition and diversity within model systems of care

Tessa Hart, Marcel Dijkers, Robert Fraser, Keith Cicerone, Jennifer A. Bogner, John Whyte, James Malec, Brigid Waldron

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine characteristics and diversity among vocational treatment services in model programs for traumatic brain injury (TBI) rehabilitation. SETTING: Vocational or postacute treatment components of 16 TBI Model System (TBIMS) centers. PARTICIPANTS: Vocational director/coordinator from each TBIMS surveyed in semistructured phone interview. MEASURE: Survey of vocational services for people with TBI, with about 100 closed and open-ended questions on vocational assessments; pre- and postjob placement treatments; program philosophies; funding; and integration of cognitive, behavioral, family, and medical rehabilitation interventions. RESULTS: Great diversity was found among the vocational services of the 16 TBIMS. Programs fell into 3 clusters emphasizing medical rehabilitation services, supported employment, or a combination of these with an emphasis on case management. Job coaching was identified as a key intervention, but there was great variability in intensity, availability, and funding of coaching services. CONCLUSION: Diversity in vocational services appears related to funding differences and "parallel evolution" rather than strong treatment philosophy or scientific evidence base. Multicenter research on effectiveness or establishment of best practices in vocational rehabilitation after TBI must deal with substantial existing variability in treatment models and specific interventions, and must examine the relationship of treatment variations to case-mix factors.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)467-482
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation
Volume21
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Rehabilitation
Therapeutics
Supported Employment
Vocational Rehabilitation
Diagnosis-Related Groups
Case Management
Practice Guidelines
Traumatic Brain Injury
Interviews
Research
Mentoring
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Measurement of treatment
  • Traumatic brain injury
  • Vocational rehabilitation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Health Professions(all)

Cite this

Vocational services for traumatic brain injury : Treatment definition and diversity within model systems of care. / Hart, Tessa; Dijkers, Marcel; Fraser, Robert; Cicerone, Keith; Bogner, Jennifer A.; Whyte, John; Malec, James; Waldron, Brigid.

In: Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, Vol. 21, No. 6, 11.2006, p. 467-482.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hart, Tessa ; Dijkers, Marcel ; Fraser, Robert ; Cicerone, Keith ; Bogner, Jennifer A. ; Whyte, John ; Malec, James ; Waldron, Brigid. / Vocational services for traumatic brain injury : Treatment definition and diversity within model systems of care. In: Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation. 2006 ; Vol. 21, No. 6. pp. 467-482.
@article{a93a7286316b46c882e04583001d8b95,
title = "Vocational services for traumatic brain injury: Treatment definition and diversity within model systems of care",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To examine characteristics and diversity among vocational treatment services in model programs for traumatic brain injury (TBI) rehabilitation. SETTING: Vocational or postacute treatment components of 16 TBI Model System (TBIMS) centers. PARTICIPANTS: Vocational director/coordinator from each TBIMS surveyed in semistructured phone interview. MEASURE: Survey of vocational services for people with TBI, with about 100 closed and open-ended questions on vocational assessments; pre- and postjob placement treatments; program philosophies; funding; and integration of cognitive, behavioral, family, and medical rehabilitation interventions. RESULTS: Great diversity was found among the vocational services of the 16 TBIMS. Programs fell into 3 clusters emphasizing medical rehabilitation services, supported employment, or a combination of these with an emphasis on case management. Job coaching was identified as a key intervention, but there was great variability in intensity, availability, and funding of coaching services. CONCLUSION: Diversity in vocational services appears related to funding differences and {"}parallel evolution{"} rather than strong treatment philosophy or scientific evidence base. Multicenter research on effectiveness or establishment of best practices in vocational rehabilitation after TBI must deal with substantial existing variability in treatment models and specific interventions, and must examine the relationship of treatment variations to case-mix factors.",
keywords = "Measurement of treatment, Traumatic brain injury, Vocational rehabilitation",
author = "Tessa Hart and Marcel Dijkers and Robert Fraser and Keith Cicerone and Bogner, {Jennifer A.} and John Whyte and James Malec and Brigid Waldron",
year = "2006",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1097/00001199-200611000-00002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "467--482",
journal = "Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation",
issn = "0885-9701",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Vocational services for traumatic brain injury

T2 - Treatment definition and diversity within model systems of care

AU - Hart, Tessa

AU - Dijkers, Marcel

AU - Fraser, Robert

AU - Cicerone, Keith

AU - Bogner, Jennifer A.

AU - Whyte, John

AU - Malec, James

AU - Waldron, Brigid

PY - 2006/11

Y1 - 2006/11

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To examine characteristics and diversity among vocational treatment services in model programs for traumatic brain injury (TBI) rehabilitation. SETTING: Vocational or postacute treatment components of 16 TBI Model System (TBIMS) centers. PARTICIPANTS: Vocational director/coordinator from each TBIMS surveyed in semistructured phone interview. MEASURE: Survey of vocational services for people with TBI, with about 100 closed and open-ended questions on vocational assessments; pre- and postjob placement treatments; program philosophies; funding; and integration of cognitive, behavioral, family, and medical rehabilitation interventions. RESULTS: Great diversity was found among the vocational services of the 16 TBIMS. Programs fell into 3 clusters emphasizing medical rehabilitation services, supported employment, or a combination of these with an emphasis on case management. Job coaching was identified as a key intervention, but there was great variability in intensity, availability, and funding of coaching services. CONCLUSION: Diversity in vocational services appears related to funding differences and "parallel evolution" rather than strong treatment philosophy or scientific evidence base. Multicenter research on effectiveness or establishment of best practices in vocational rehabilitation after TBI must deal with substantial existing variability in treatment models and specific interventions, and must examine the relationship of treatment variations to case-mix factors.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To examine characteristics and diversity among vocational treatment services in model programs for traumatic brain injury (TBI) rehabilitation. SETTING: Vocational or postacute treatment components of 16 TBI Model System (TBIMS) centers. PARTICIPANTS: Vocational director/coordinator from each TBIMS surveyed in semistructured phone interview. MEASURE: Survey of vocational services for people with TBI, with about 100 closed and open-ended questions on vocational assessments; pre- and postjob placement treatments; program philosophies; funding; and integration of cognitive, behavioral, family, and medical rehabilitation interventions. RESULTS: Great diversity was found among the vocational services of the 16 TBIMS. Programs fell into 3 clusters emphasizing medical rehabilitation services, supported employment, or a combination of these with an emphasis on case management. Job coaching was identified as a key intervention, but there was great variability in intensity, availability, and funding of coaching services. CONCLUSION: Diversity in vocational services appears related to funding differences and "parallel evolution" rather than strong treatment philosophy or scientific evidence base. Multicenter research on effectiveness or establishment of best practices in vocational rehabilitation after TBI must deal with substantial existing variability in treatment models and specific interventions, and must examine the relationship of treatment variations to case-mix factors.

KW - Measurement of treatment

KW - Traumatic brain injury

KW - Vocational rehabilitation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33751363029&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33751363029&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00001199-200611000-00002

DO - 10.1097/00001199-200611000-00002

M3 - Article

C2 - 17122678

AN - SCOPUS:33751363029

VL - 21

SP - 467

EP - 482

JO - Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation

JF - Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation

SN - 0885-9701

IS - 6

ER -