Watchful waiting in the treatment of the small renal mass

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives : To evaluate the role and feasibility of observation with regard to the small renal mass. Methods : We performed a literature search of MEDLINE, reviewing the world literature relevant to the natural history, role of percutaneous biopsy and surveillance of the small renal mass. Results : The average yearly growth rate of most small renal masses ranges from 0.1 to 0.70 cm/yr with obvious exceptions. Clinical predictors of growth such as radiographic size at presentation, age, gender and tumor characteristics are not reliable. Approximately 1% develops metastatic disease while under surveillance. Contemporary series of percutaneous biopsy of small renal masses report sensitivity for malignancy to be 90%-98%. However, false-negative results can occur. For the majority of patients, the gold standard remains surgical extirpation. Conclusions : Watchful waiting is an acceptable option for management of small renal masses in the surgically unfit and elderly population. More information regarding the natural history and metastatic potential of small renal masses is needed. Percutaneous needle biopsy can be successful in detecting malignancy in selected patients with small renal masses. The role of needle biopsy for the small renal mass continues to evolve.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)489-493
Number of pages5
JournalIndian Journal of Urology
Volume25
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2009

Fingerprint

Watchful Waiting
Kidney
Needle Biopsy
Therapeutics
Natural History
Biopsy
Neoplasms
Growth
MEDLINE
Observation

Keywords

  • Active surveillance
  • Kidney neoplasms
  • Natural history
  • Needle biopsy
  • Small renal tumor

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Watchful waiting in the treatment of the small renal mass. / Cary, K. Clint; Sundaram, Chandru P.

In: Indian Journal of Urology, Vol. 25, No. 4, 01.10.2009, p. 489-493.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bd9ecd64c5af44a2b41b39f9aa7969dc,
title = "Watchful waiting in the treatment of the small renal mass",
abstract = "Objectives : To evaluate the role and feasibility of observation with regard to the small renal mass. Methods : We performed a literature search of MEDLINE, reviewing the world literature relevant to the natural history, role of percutaneous biopsy and surveillance of the small renal mass. Results : The average yearly growth rate of most small renal masses ranges from 0.1 to 0.70 cm/yr with obvious exceptions. Clinical predictors of growth such as radiographic size at presentation, age, gender and tumor characteristics are not reliable. Approximately 1{\%} develops metastatic disease while under surveillance. Contemporary series of percutaneous biopsy of small renal masses report sensitivity for malignancy to be 90{\%}-98{\%}. However, false-negative results can occur. For the majority of patients, the gold standard remains surgical extirpation. Conclusions : Watchful waiting is an acceptable option for management of small renal masses in the surgically unfit and elderly population. More information regarding the natural history and metastatic potential of small renal masses is needed. Percutaneous needle biopsy can be successful in detecting malignancy in selected patients with small renal masses. The role of needle biopsy for the small renal mass continues to evolve.",
keywords = "Active surveillance, Kidney neoplasms, Natural history, Needle biopsy, Small renal tumor",
author = "Cary, {K. Clint} and Sundaram, {Chandru P.}",
year = "2009",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4103/0970-1591.57923",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "489--493",
journal = "Indian Journal of Urology",
issn = "0970-1591",
publisher = "Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Watchful waiting in the treatment of the small renal mass

AU - Cary, K. Clint

AU - Sundaram, Chandru P.

PY - 2009/10/1

Y1 - 2009/10/1

N2 - Objectives : To evaluate the role and feasibility of observation with regard to the small renal mass. Methods : We performed a literature search of MEDLINE, reviewing the world literature relevant to the natural history, role of percutaneous biopsy and surveillance of the small renal mass. Results : The average yearly growth rate of most small renal masses ranges from 0.1 to 0.70 cm/yr with obvious exceptions. Clinical predictors of growth such as radiographic size at presentation, age, gender and tumor characteristics are not reliable. Approximately 1% develops metastatic disease while under surveillance. Contemporary series of percutaneous biopsy of small renal masses report sensitivity for malignancy to be 90%-98%. However, false-negative results can occur. For the majority of patients, the gold standard remains surgical extirpation. Conclusions : Watchful waiting is an acceptable option for management of small renal masses in the surgically unfit and elderly population. More information regarding the natural history and metastatic potential of small renal masses is needed. Percutaneous needle biopsy can be successful in detecting malignancy in selected patients with small renal masses. The role of needle biopsy for the small renal mass continues to evolve.

AB - Objectives : To evaluate the role and feasibility of observation with regard to the small renal mass. Methods : We performed a literature search of MEDLINE, reviewing the world literature relevant to the natural history, role of percutaneous biopsy and surveillance of the small renal mass. Results : The average yearly growth rate of most small renal masses ranges from 0.1 to 0.70 cm/yr with obvious exceptions. Clinical predictors of growth such as radiographic size at presentation, age, gender and tumor characteristics are not reliable. Approximately 1% develops metastatic disease while under surveillance. Contemporary series of percutaneous biopsy of small renal masses report sensitivity for malignancy to be 90%-98%. However, false-negative results can occur. For the majority of patients, the gold standard remains surgical extirpation. Conclusions : Watchful waiting is an acceptable option for management of small renal masses in the surgically unfit and elderly population. More information regarding the natural history and metastatic potential of small renal masses is needed. Percutaneous needle biopsy can be successful in detecting malignancy in selected patients with small renal masses. The role of needle biopsy for the small renal mass continues to evolve.

KW - Active surveillance

KW - Kidney neoplasms

KW - Natural history

KW - Needle biopsy

KW - Small renal tumor

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=72749108644&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=72749108644&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4103/0970-1591.57923

DO - 10.4103/0970-1591.57923

M3 - Article

C2 - 19955675

AN - SCOPUS:72749108644

VL - 25

SP - 489

EP - 493

JO - Indian Journal of Urology

JF - Indian Journal of Urology

SN - 0970-1591

IS - 4

ER -