What are health-related users tweeting? A qualitative content analysis of health-related users and their messages on Twitter

Joy Lee, Matthew DeCamp, Mark Dredze, Margaret S. Chisolm, Zackary D. Berger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

38 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Twitter is home to many health professionals who send messages about a variety of health-related topics. Amid concerns about physicians posting inappropriate content online, more in-depth knowledge about these messages is needed to understand health professionals' behavior on Twitter. Objective: Our goal was to characterize the content of Twitter messages, specifically focusing on health professionals and their tweets relating to health. Methods: We performed an in-depth content analysis of 700 tweets. Qualitative content analysis was conducted on tweets by health users on Twitter. The primary objective was to describe the general type of content (ie, health-related versus non-health related) on Twitter authored by health professionals and further to describe health-related tweets on the basis of the type of statement made. Specific attention was given to whether a tweet was personal (as opposed to professional) or made a claim that users would expect to be supported by some level of medical evidence (ie, a "testable" claim). A secondary objective was to compare content types among different users, including patients, physicians, nurses, health care organizations, and others. Results: Health-related users are posting a wide range of content on Twitter. Among health-related tweets, 53.2% (184/346) contained a testable claim. Of health-related tweets by providers, 17.6% (61/346) were personal in nature; 61% (59/96) made testable statements. While organizations and businesses use Twitter to promote their services and products, patient advocates are using this tool to share their personal experiences with health. Conclusions: Twitter users in health-related fields tweet about both testable claims and personal experiences. Future work should assess the relationship between testable tweets and the actual level of evidence supporting them, including how Twitter users - especially patients - interpret the content of tweets posted by health providers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)e237
JournalJournal of Medical Internet Research
Volume16
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Health
Physicians
Nurses
Delivery of Health Care

Keywords

  • Communication
  • Consumer health informatics
  • Health information technology
  • Social media

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Informatics

Cite this

What are health-related users tweeting? A qualitative content analysis of health-related users and their messages on Twitter. / Lee, Joy; DeCamp, Matthew; Dredze, Mark; Chisolm, Margaret S.; Berger, Zackary D.

In: Journal of Medical Internet Research, Vol. 16, No. 10, 01.01.2014, p. e237.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lee, Joy ; DeCamp, Matthew ; Dredze, Mark ; Chisolm, Margaret S. ; Berger, Zackary D. / What are health-related users tweeting? A qualitative content analysis of health-related users and their messages on Twitter. In: Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2014 ; Vol. 16, No. 10. pp. e237.
@article{5d03ae1261a04cd18ecc18453103dde0,
title = "What are health-related users tweeting? A qualitative content analysis of health-related users and their messages on Twitter",
abstract = "Background: Twitter is home to many health professionals who send messages about a variety of health-related topics. Amid concerns about physicians posting inappropriate content online, more in-depth knowledge about these messages is needed to understand health professionals' behavior on Twitter. Objective: Our goal was to characterize the content of Twitter messages, specifically focusing on health professionals and their tweets relating to health. Methods: We performed an in-depth content analysis of 700 tweets. Qualitative content analysis was conducted on tweets by health users on Twitter. The primary objective was to describe the general type of content (ie, health-related versus non-health related) on Twitter authored by health professionals and further to describe health-related tweets on the basis of the type of statement made. Specific attention was given to whether a tweet was personal (as opposed to professional) or made a claim that users would expect to be supported by some level of medical evidence (ie, a {"}testable{"} claim). A secondary objective was to compare content types among different users, including patients, physicians, nurses, health care organizations, and others. Results: Health-related users are posting a wide range of content on Twitter. Among health-related tweets, 53.2{\%} (184/346) contained a testable claim. Of health-related tweets by providers, 17.6{\%} (61/346) were personal in nature; 61{\%} (59/96) made testable statements. While organizations and businesses use Twitter to promote their services and products, patient advocates are using this tool to share their personal experiences with health. Conclusions: Twitter users in health-related fields tweet about both testable claims and personal experiences. Future work should assess the relationship between testable tweets and the actual level of evidence supporting them, including how Twitter users - especially patients - interpret the content of tweets posted by health providers.",
keywords = "Communication, Consumer health informatics, Health information technology, Social media",
author = "Joy Lee and Matthew DeCamp and Mark Dredze and Chisolm, {Margaret S.} and Berger, {Zackary D.}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2196/jmir.3765",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "e237",
journal = "Journal of Medical Internet Research",
issn = "1439-4456",
publisher = "Journal of medical Internet Research",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What are health-related users tweeting? A qualitative content analysis of health-related users and their messages on Twitter

AU - Lee, Joy

AU - DeCamp, Matthew

AU - Dredze, Mark

AU - Chisolm, Margaret S.

AU - Berger, Zackary D.

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Background: Twitter is home to many health professionals who send messages about a variety of health-related topics. Amid concerns about physicians posting inappropriate content online, more in-depth knowledge about these messages is needed to understand health professionals' behavior on Twitter. Objective: Our goal was to characterize the content of Twitter messages, specifically focusing on health professionals and their tweets relating to health. Methods: We performed an in-depth content analysis of 700 tweets. Qualitative content analysis was conducted on tweets by health users on Twitter. The primary objective was to describe the general type of content (ie, health-related versus non-health related) on Twitter authored by health professionals and further to describe health-related tweets on the basis of the type of statement made. Specific attention was given to whether a tweet was personal (as opposed to professional) or made a claim that users would expect to be supported by some level of medical evidence (ie, a "testable" claim). A secondary objective was to compare content types among different users, including patients, physicians, nurses, health care organizations, and others. Results: Health-related users are posting a wide range of content on Twitter. Among health-related tweets, 53.2% (184/346) contained a testable claim. Of health-related tweets by providers, 17.6% (61/346) were personal in nature; 61% (59/96) made testable statements. While organizations and businesses use Twitter to promote their services and products, patient advocates are using this tool to share their personal experiences with health. Conclusions: Twitter users in health-related fields tweet about both testable claims and personal experiences. Future work should assess the relationship between testable tweets and the actual level of evidence supporting them, including how Twitter users - especially patients - interpret the content of tweets posted by health providers.

AB - Background: Twitter is home to many health professionals who send messages about a variety of health-related topics. Amid concerns about physicians posting inappropriate content online, more in-depth knowledge about these messages is needed to understand health professionals' behavior on Twitter. Objective: Our goal was to characterize the content of Twitter messages, specifically focusing on health professionals and their tweets relating to health. Methods: We performed an in-depth content analysis of 700 tweets. Qualitative content analysis was conducted on tweets by health users on Twitter. The primary objective was to describe the general type of content (ie, health-related versus non-health related) on Twitter authored by health professionals and further to describe health-related tweets on the basis of the type of statement made. Specific attention was given to whether a tweet was personal (as opposed to professional) or made a claim that users would expect to be supported by some level of medical evidence (ie, a "testable" claim). A secondary objective was to compare content types among different users, including patients, physicians, nurses, health care organizations, and others. Results: Health-related users are posting a wide range of content on Twitter. Among health-related tweets, 53.2% (184/346) contained a testable claim. Of health-related tweets by providers, 17.6% (61/346) were personal in nature; 61% (59/96) made testable statements. While organizations and businesses use Twitter to promote their services and products, patient advocates are using this tool to share their personal experiences with health. Conclusions: Twitter users in health-related fields tweet about both testable claims and personal experiences. Future work should assess the relationship between testable tweets and the actual level of evidence supporting them, including how Twitter users - especially patients - interpret the content of tweets posted by health providers.

KW - Communication

KW - Consumer health informatics

KW - Health information technology

KW - Social media

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84910136235&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84910136235&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2196/jmir.3765

DO - 10.2196/jmir.3765

M3 - Article

C2 - 25591063

AN - SCOPUS:84910136235

VL - 16

SP - e237

JO - Journal of Medical Internet Research

JF - Journal of Medical Internet Research

SN - 1439-4456

IS - 10

ER -