What is a medical decision? A taxonomy based on physician statements in hospital encounters

A qualitative study

Eirik H. Ofstad, Jan C. Frich, Edvin Schei, Richard Frankel, Pål Gulbrandsen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The medical literature lacks a comprehensive taxonomy of decisions made by physicians in medical encounters. Such a taxonomy might be useful in understanding the physician-centred, patient-centred and shared decision-making in clinical settings. We aimed to identify and classify all decisions emerging in conversations between patients and physicians. Design: Qualitative study of video recorded patient-physician encounters. Participants and setting: 380 patients in consultations with 59 physicians from 17 clinical specialties and three different settings (emergency room, ward round, outpatient clinic) in a Norwegian teaching hospital. A randomised sample of 30 encounters from internal medicine was used to identify and classify decisions, a maximum variation sample of 20 encounters was used for reliability assessments, and the remaining encounters were analysed to test for applicability across specialties. Results: On the basis of physician statements in our material, we developed a taxonomy of clinical decisions -the Decision Identification and Classification Taxonomy for Use in Medicine (DICTUM). We categorised decisions into 10 mutually exclusive categories: gathering additional information, evaluating test results, defining problem, drug-related, therapeutic procedure-related, legal and insurance-related, contactrelated, advice and precaution, treatment goal, and deferment. Four-coder inter-rater reliability using Krippendorff's α was 0.79. Conclusions: DICTUM represents a precise, detailed and comprehensive taxonomy of medical decisions communicated within patient-physician encounters. Compared to previous normative frameworks, the taxonomy is descriptive, substantially broader and offers new categories to the variety of clinical decisions. The taxonomy could prove helpful in studies on the quality of medical work, use of time and resources, and understanding of why, when and how patients are or are not involved in decisions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere010098
JournalBMJ Open
Volume6
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Physicians
Hospital Emergency Service
Medicine
Internal Medicine
Ambulatory Care Facilities
Insurance
Teaching Hospitals
Decision Making
Referral and Consultation
Therapeutics
Pharmaceutical Preparations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

What is a medical decision? A taxonomy based on physician statements in hospital encounters : A qualitative study. / Ofstad, Eirik H.; Frich, Jan C.; Schei, Edvin; Frankel, Richard; Gulbrandsen, Pål.

In: BMJ Open, Vol. 6, No. 2, e010098, 2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ofstad, Eirik H. ; Frich, Jan C. ; Schei, Edvin ; Frankel, Richard ; Gulbrandsen, Pål. / What is a medical decision? A taxonomy based on physician statements in hospital encounters : A qualitative study. In: BMJ Open. 2016 ; Vol. 6, No. 2.
@article{da9c65ed7034416091a6db92ae5b057d,
title = "What is a medical decision? A taxonomy based on physician statements in hospital encounters: A qualitative study",
abstract = "Objective: The medical literature lacks a comprehensive taxonomy of decisions made by physicians in medical encounters. Such a taxonomy might be useful in understanding the physician-centred, patient-centred and shared decision-making in clinical settings. We aimed to identify and classify all decisions emerging in conversations between patients and physicians. Design: Qualitative study of video recorded patient-physician encounters. Participants and setting: 380 patients in consultations with 59 physicians from 17 clinical specialties and three different settings (emergency room, ward round, outpatient clinic) in a Norwegian teaching hospital. A randomised sample of 30 encounters from internal medicine was used to identify and classify decisions, a maximum variation sample of 20 encounters was used for reliability assessments, and the remaining encounters were analysed to test for applicability across specialties. Results: On the basis of physician statements in our material, we developed a taxonomy of clinical decisions -the Decision Identification and Classification Taxonomy for Use in Medicine (DICTUM). We categorised decisions into 10 mutually exclusive categories: gathering additional information, evaluating test results, defining problem, drug-related, therapeutic procedure-related, legal and insurance-related, contactrelated, advice and precaution, treatment goal, and deferment. Four-coder inter-rater reliability using Krippendorff's α was 0.79. Conclusions: DICTUM represents a precise, detailed and comprehensive taxonomy of medical decisions communicated within patient-physician encounters. Compared to previous normative frameworks, the taxonomy is descriptive, substantially broader and offers new categories to the variety of clinical decisions. The taxonomy could prove helpful in studies on the quality of medical work, use of time and resources, and understanding of why, when and how patients are or are not involved in decisions.",
author = "Ofstad, {Eirik H.} and Frich, {Jan C.} and Edvin Schei and Richard Frankel and P{\aa}l Gulbrandsen",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010098",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
journal = "BMJ Open",
issn = "2044-6055",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What is a medical decision? A taxonomy based on physician statements in hospital encounters

T2 - A qualitative study

AU - Ofstad, Eirik H.

AU - Frich, Jan C.

AU - Schei, Edvin

AU - Frankel, Richard

AU - Gulbrandsen, Pål

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Objective: The medical literature lacks a comprehensive taxonomy of decisions made by physicians in medical encounters. Such a taxonomy might be useful in understanding the physician-centred, patient-centred and shared decision-making in clinical settings. We aimed to identify and classify all decisions emerging in conversations between patients and physicians. Design: Qualitative study of video recorded patient-physician encounters. Participants and setting: 380 patients in consultations with 59 physicians from 17 clinical specialties and three different settings (emergency room, ward round, outpatient clinic) in a Norwegian teaching hospital. A randomised sample of 30 encounters from internal medicine was used to identify and classify decisions, a maximum variation sample of 20 encounters was used for reliability assessments, and the remaining encounters were analysed to test for applicability across specialties. Results: On the basis of physician statements in our material, we developed a taxonomy of clinical decisions -the Decision Identification and Classification Taxonomy for Use in Medicine (DICTUM). We categorised decisions into 10 mutually exclusive categories: gathering additional information, evaluating test results, defining problem, drug-related, therapeutic procedure-related, legal and insurance-related, contactrelated, advice and precaution, treatment goal, and deferment. Four-coder inter-rater reliability using Krippendorff's α was 0.79. Conclusions: DICTUM represents a precise, detailed and comprehensive taxonomy of medical decisions communicated within patient-physician encounters. Compared to previous normative frameworks, the taxonomy is descriptive, substantially broader and offers new categories to the variety of clinical decisions. The taxonomy could prove helpful in studies on the quality of medical work, use of time and resources, and understanding of why, when and how patients are or are not involved in decisions.

AB - Objective: The medical literature lacks a comprehensive taxonomy of decisions made by physicians in medical encounters. Such a taxonomy might be useful in understanding the physician-centred, patient-centred and shared decision-making in clinical settings. We aimed to identify and classify all decisions emerging in conversations between patients and physicians. Design: Qualitative study of video recorded patient-physician encounters. Participants and setting: 380 patients in consultations with 59 physicians from 17 clinical specialties and three different settings (emergency room, ward round, outpatient clinic) in a Norwegian teaching hospital. A randomised sample of 30 encounters from internal medicine was used to identify and classify decisions, a maximum variation sample of 20 encounters was used for reliability assessments, and the remaining encounters were analysed to test for applicability across specialties. Results: On the basis of physician statements in our material, we developed a taxonomy of clinical decisions -the Decision Identification and Classification Taxonomy for Use in Medicine (DICTUM). We categorised decisions into 10 mutually exclusive categories: gathering additional information, evaluating test results, defining problem, drug-related, therapeutic procedure-related, legal and insurance-related, contactrelated, advice and precaution, treatment goal, and deferment. Four-coder inter-rater reliability using Krippendorff's α was 0.79. Conclusions: DICTUM represents a precise, detailed and comprehensive taxonomy of medical decisions communicated within patient-physician encounters. Compared to previous normative frameworks, the taxonomy is descriptive, substantially broader and offers new categories to the variety of clinical decisions. The taxonomy could prove helpful in studies on the quality of medical work, use of time and resources, and understanding of why, when and how patients are or are not involved in decisions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84960352849&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84960352849&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010098

DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010098

M3 - Article

VL - 6

JO - BMJ Open

JF - BMJ Open

SN - 2044-6055

IS - 2

M1 - e010098

ER -