What should be reported in a methods section on utility assessment?

Peep F.M. Stalmeier, M. K. Goldstein, Ann Holmes, L. Lenert, J. Miyamoto, A. M. Stiggelbout, G. W. Torrance, J. Tsevat

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

48 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. The measurement of utilities, or preferences, for health states may be affected by the technique used. Unfortunately, in papers reporting utilities, it is often difficult to infer how the utility measurement was carried out. Purpose. To present a list of components that, when described, provide sufficient detail of the utility assessment. Methods. An initial list was prepared by one of the authors. A panel of 8 experts was formed to add additional components. The components were drawn from 6 clusters that focus on the design of the study, the administration procedure, the health state descriptions, the description of the utility assessment method, the description of the indifference procedure, and the use of visual aids or software programs. The list was updated and redistributed among a total of 14 experts, and the components were judged for their importance of being mentioned in a Methods section. Results. More than 40 components were generated. Ten components were identified as necessary to include even in an article not focusing on utility measurement: how utility questions were administered, how health states were described, which utility assessment method(s) was used, the response and completion rates, specification of the duration of the health states, which software program (if any) was used, the description of the worst health state (lower anchor of the scale), whether a matching or choice indifference search procedure was used, when the assessment was conducted relative to treatment, and which (if any) visual aids were used. The interjudge reliability was satisfactory (Cronbach's alpha = 0.85). Discussion. The list of components important for utility papers may be used in various ways, for instance, as a checklist while writing, reviewing, or reading a Methods section or while designing experiments. Guidelines are provided for a few components.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)200-207
Number of pages8
JournalMedical Decision Making
Volume21
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Audiovisual Aids
Health
Software
Checklist
Reading
Guidelines

Keywords

  • Cost-utility assessment
  • Utility assessment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

Stalmeier, P. F. M., Goldstein, M. K., Holmes, A., Lenert, L., Miyamoto, J., Stiggelbout, A. M., ... Tsevat, J. (2001). What should be reported in a methods section on utility assessment? Medical Decision Making, 21(3), 200-207. https://doi.org/10.1177/02729890122062497

What should be reported in a methods section on utility assessment? / Stalmeier, Peep F.M.; Goldstein, M. K.; Holmes, Ann; Lenert, L.; Miyamoto, J.; Stiggelbout, A. M.; Torrance, G. W.; Tsevat, J.

In: Medical Decision Making, Vol. 21, No. 3, 01.01.2001, p. 200-207.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Stalmeier, PFM, Goldstein, MK, Holmes, A, Lenert, L, Miyamoto, J, Stiggelbout, AM, Torrance, GW & Tsevat, J 2001, 'What should be reported in a methods section on utility assessment?', Medical Decision Making, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 200-207. https://doi.org/10.1177/02729890122062497
Stalmeier PFM, Goldstein MK, Holmes A, Lenert L, Miyamoto J, Stiggelbout AM et al. What should be reported in a methods section on utility assessment? Medical Decision Making. 2001 Jan 1;21(3):200-207. https://doi.org/10.1177/02729890122062497
Stalmeier, Peep F.M. ; Goldstein, M. K. ; Holmes, Ann ; Lenert, L. ; Miyamoto, J. ; Stiggelbout, A. M. ; Torrance, G. W. ; Tsevat, J. / What should be reported in a methods section on utility assessment?. In: Medical Decision Making. 2001 ; Vol. 21, No. 3. pp. 200-207.
@article{9297f8f3f76342109a348086b1750cb7,
title = "What should be reported in a methods section on utility assessment?",
abstract = "Background. The measurement of utilities, or preferences, for health states may be affected by the technique used. Unfortunately, in papers reporting utilities, it is often difficult to infer how the utility measurement was carried out. Purpose. To present a list of components that, when described, provide sufficient detail of the utility assessment. Methods. An initial list was prepared by one of the authors. A panel of 8 experts was formed to add additional components. The components were drawn from 6 clusters that focus on the design of the study, the administration procedure, the health state descriptions, the description of the utility assessment method, the description of the indifference procedure, and the use of visual aids or software programs. The list was updated and redistributed among a total of 14 experts, and the components were judged for their importance of being mentioned in a Methods section. Results. More than 40 components were generated. Ten components were identified as necessary to include even in an article not focusing on utility measurement: how utility questions were administered, how health states were described, which utility assessment method(s) was used, the response and completion rates, specification of the duration of the health states, which software program (if any) was used, the description of the worst health state (lower anchor of the scale), whether a matching or choice indifference search procedure was used, when the assessment was conducted relative to treatment, and which (if any) visual aids were used. The interjudge reliability was satisfactory (Cronbach's alpha = 0.85). Discussion. The list of components important for utility papers may be used in various ways, for instance, as a checklist while writing, reviewing, or reading a Methods section or while designing experiments. Guidelines are provided for a few components.",
keywords = "Cost-utility assessment, Utility assessment",
author = "Stalmeier, {Peep F.M.} and Goldstein, {M. K.} and Ann Holmes and L. Lenert and J. Miyamoto and Stiggelbout, {A. M.} and Torrance, {G. W.} and J. Tsevat",
year = "2001",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/02729890122062497",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "200--207",
journal = "Medical Decision Making",
issn = "0272-989X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What should be reported in a methods section on utility assessment?

AU - Stalmeier, Peep F.M.

AU - Goldstein, M. K.

AU - Holmes, Ann

AU - Lenert, L.

AU - Miyamoto, J.

AU - Stiggelbout, A. M.

AU - Torrance, G. W.

AU - Tsevat, J.

PY - 2001/1/1

Y1 - 2001/1/1

N2 - Background. The measurement of utilities, or preferences, for health states may be affected by the technique used. Unfortunately, in papers reporting utilities, it is often difficult to infer how the utility measurement was carried out. Purpose. To present a list of components that, when described, provide sufficient detail of the utility assessment. Methods. An initial list was prepared by one of the authors. A panel of 8 experts was formed to add additional components. The components were drawn from 6 clusters that focus on the design of the study, the administration procedure, the health state descriptions, the description of the utility assessment method, the description of the indifference procedure, and the use of visual aids or software programs. The list was updated and redistributed among a total of 14 experts, and the components were judged for their importance of being mentioned in a Methods section. Results. More than 40 components were generated. Ten components were identified as necessary to include even in an article not focusing on utility measurement: how utility questions were administered, how health states were described, which utility assessment method(s) was used, the response and completion rates, specification of the duration of the health states, which software program (if any) was used, the description of the worst health state (lower anchor of the scale), whether a matching or choice indifference search procedure was used, when the assessment was conducted relative to treatment, and which (if any) visual aids were used. The interjudge reliability was satisfactory (Cronbach's alpha = 0.85). Discussion. The list of components important for utility papers may be used in various ways, for instance, as a checklist while writing, reviewing, or reading a Methods section or while designing experiments. Guidelines are provided for a few components.

AB - Background. The measurement of utilities, or preferences, for health states may be affected by the technique used. Unfortunately, in papers reporting utilities, it is often difficult to infer how the utility measurement was carried out. Purpose. To present a list of components that, when described, provide sufficient detail of the utility assessment. Methods. An initial list was prepared by one of the authors. A panel of 8 experts was formed to add additional components. The components were drawn from 6 clusters that focus on the design of the study, the administration procedure, the health state descriptions, the description of the utility assessment method, the description of the indifference procedure, and the use of visual aids or software programs. The list was updated and redistributed among a total of 14 experts, and the components were judged for their importance of being mentioned in a Methods section. Results. More than 40 components were generated. Ten components were identified as necessary to include even in an article not focusing on utility measurement: how utility questions were administered, how health states were described, which utility assessment method(s) was used, the response and completion rates, specification of the duration of the health states, which software program (if any) was used, the description of the worst health state (lower anchor of the scale), whether a matching or choice indifference search procedure was used, when the assessment was conducted relative to treatment, and which (if any) visual aids were used. The interjudge reliability was satisfactory (Cronbach's alpha = 0.85). Discussion. The list of components important for utility papers may be used in various ways, for instance, as a checklist while writing, reviewing, or reading a Methods section or while designing experiments. Guidelines are provided for a few components.

KW - Cost-utility assessment

KW - Utility assessment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047696274&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047696274&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/02729890122062497

DO - 10.1177/02729890122062497

M3 - Article

C2 - 11386627

AN - SCOPUS:85047696274

VL - 21

SP - 200

EP - 207

JO - Medical Decision Making

JF - Medical Decision Making

SN - 0272-989X

IS - 3

ER -