Women's understanding of their Pap and HPV test results: Implications for patient–provider communication

Katharine J. Head, Teresa M. Imburgia, Gregory Zimet, Marcia Shew

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: As changing guidelines for cervical cancer detection incorporate more human papillomavirus (HPV) testing along with Papanicolaou (Pap) smear testing (‘co-testing’) in clinical practice, there is a need to evaluate patient understanding of these two tests. Methods: Thirty women (mean age = 27.8 years; 90% African-American) with low SEC status were recruited for two clinical research visits; a Pap test and cervical HPV test were performed at the first visit and a doctor shared the test results (i.e. Pap and HPV test) at the second. Then, a semi-structured interview focused on participants’ recall of the discussion with the provider as well as their general understanding of the tests. Results: Findings revealed participants were familiar with the Pap test and were proactive about receiving the test, despite lacking accurate knowledge about the purpose of the test. On the other hand, when participants expressed confusion and anxiety about the HPV test, patient–provider communication helped to ease some of these concerns. Patients expressed a range of ability in reconciling how the two tests were connected, what the two results meant together, and why both are needed. Conclusion: This qualitative data suggests important gaps in women's understandings of Pap test and HPV test results, especially when used together in a clinical visit. There is a need to address this lack of understanding as the use of co-testing in clinical practice increases. Implications for improved communication strategies between patients and providers about how to share and interpret Pap test and HPV tests results in the clinical setting are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-11
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Communication in Healthcare
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Feb 2 2017

Fingerprint

Papanicolaou Test
Communication
communication
Testing
Confusion
Aptitude
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
African Americans
Anxiety
Guidelines
Interviews
Research

Keywords

  • Health literacy
  • HPV
  • HPV test
  • Human papillomavirus
  • Pap test
  • Patient–provider communication

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication
  • Health Information Management

Cite this

Women's understanding of their Pap and HPV test results : Implications for patient–provider communication. / Head, Katharine J.; Imburgia, Teresa M.; Zimet, Gregory; Shew, Marcia.

In: Journal of Communication in Healthcare, 02.02.2017, p. 1-11.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{55ba4befe85942f18a6f8e7e005a411c,
title = "Women's understanding of their Pap and HPV test results: Implications for patient–provider communication",
abstract = "Background: As changing guidelines for cervical cancer detection incorporate more human papillomavirus (HPV) testing along with Papanicolaou (Pap) smear testing (‘co-testing’) in clinical practice, there is a need to evaluate patient understanding of these two tests. Methods: Thirty women (mean age = 27.8 years; 90{\%} African-American) with low SEC status were recruited for two clinical research visits; a Pap test and cervical HPV test were performed at the first visit and a doctor shared the test results (i.e. Pap and HPV test) at the second. Then, a semi-structured interview focused on participants’ recall of the discussion with the provider as well as their general understanding of the tests. Results: Findings revealed participants were familiar with the Pap test and were proactive about receiving the test, despite lacking accurate knowledge about the purpose of the test. On the other hand, when participants expressed confusion and anxiety about the HPV test, patient–provider communication helped to ease some of these concerns. Patients expressed a range of ability in reconciling how the two tests were connected, what the two results meant together, and why both are needed. Conclusion: This qualitative data suggests important gaps in women's understandings of Pap test and HPV test results, especially when used together in a clinical visit. There is a need to address this lack of understanding as the use of co-testing in clinical practice increases. Implications for improved communication strategies between patients and providers about how to share and interpret Pap test and HPV tests results in the clinical setting are discussed.",
keywords = "Health literacy, HPV, HPV test, Human papillomavirus, Pap test, Patient–provider communication",
author = "Head, {Katharine J.} and Imburgia, {Teresa M.} and Gregory Zimet and Marcia Shew",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/17538068.2017.1282085",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--11",
journal = "Journal of Communication in Healthcare",
issn = "1753-8068",
publisher = "Maney Publishing",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Women's understanding of their Pap and HPV test results

T2 - Implications for patient–provider communication

AU - Head, Katharine J.

AU - Imburgia, Teresa M.

AU - Zimet, Gregory

AU - Shew, Marcia

PY - 2017/2/2

Y1 - 2017/2/2

N2 - Background: As changing guidelines for cervical cancer detection incorporate more human papillomavirus (HPV) testing along with Papanicolaou (Pap) smear testing (‘co-testing’) in clinical practice, there is a need to evaluate patient understanding of these two tests. Methods: Thirty women (mean age = 27.8 years; 90% African-American) with low SEC status were recruited for two clinical research visits; a Pap test and cervical HPV test were performed at the first visit and a doctor shared the test results (i.e. Pap and HPV test) at the second. Then, a semi-structured interview focused on participants’ recall of the discussion with the provider as well as their general understanding of the tests. Results: Findings revealed participants were familiar with the Pap test and were proactive about receiving the test, despite lacking accurate knowledge about the purpose of the test. On the other hand, when participants expressed confusion and anxiety about the HPV test, patient–provider communication helped to ease some of these concerns. Patients expressed a range of ability in reconciling how the two tests were connected, what the two results meant together, and why both are needed. Conclusion: This qualitative data suggests important gaps in women's understandings of Pap test and HPV test results, especially when used together in a clinical visit. There is a need to address this lack of understanding as the use of co-testing in clinical practice increases. Implications for improved communication strategies between patients and providers about how to share and interpret Pap test and HPV tests results in the clinical setting are discussed.

AB - Background: As changing guidelines for cervical cancer detection incorporate more human papillomavirus (HPV) testing along with Papanicolaou (Pap) smear testing (‘co-testing’) in clinical practice, there is a need to evaluate patient understanding of these two tests. Methods: Thirty women (mean age = 27.8 years; 90% African-American) with low SEC status were recruited for two clinical research visits; a Pap test and cervical HPV test were performed at the first visit and a doctor shared the test results (i.e. Pap and HPV test) at the second. Then, a semi-structured interview focused on participants’ recall of the discussion with the provider as well as their general understanding of the tests. Results: Findings revealed participants were familiar with the Pap test and were proactive about receiving the test, despite lacking accurate knowledge about the purpose of the test. On the other hand, when participants expressed confusion and anxiety about the HPV test, patient–provider communication helped to ease some of these concerns. Patients expressed a range of ability in reconciling how the two tests were connected, what the two results meant together, and why both are needed. Conclusion: This qualitative data suggests important gaps in women's understandings of Pap test and HPV test results, especially when used together in a clinical visit. There is a need to address this lack of understanding as the use of co-testing in clinical practice increases. Implications for improved communication strategies between patients and providers about how to share and interpret Pap test and HPV tests results in the clinical setting are discussed.

KW - Health literacy

KW - HPV

KW - HPV test

KW - Human papillomavirus

KW - Pap test

KW - Patient–provider communication

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85011256447&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85011256447&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/17538068.2017.1282085

DO - 10.1080/17538068.2017.1282085

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85011256447

SP - 1

EP - 11

JO - Journal of Communication in Healthcare

JF - Journal of Communication in Healthcare

SN - 1753-8068

ER -