Work interrupted

A comparison of workplace interruptions in emergency departments and primary care offices

Carey D. Chisholm, Amanda M. Dornfeld, David R. Nelson, William H. Cordell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

191 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study objective: We sought to determine the number of interruptions and to characterize tasks performed in emergency departments compared with those performed in primary care offices. Methods: We conducted an observational time-motion, task-analysis study in 5 nonteaching community hospitals and 22 primary care offices in 5 central Indiana cities. Twenty-two emergency physicians and 22 office-based primary care physicians (PCPs) were observed at work. The number of interruptions, tasks, simultaneous tasks, and patients concurrently managed were recorded in 1-minute increments during 150- to 210-minute observation periods. Results: Emergency physicians were interrupted an average of 9.7 times per hour compared with 3.9 times per hour for PCPs, for an average difference of 5.8 times per hour (95% confidence interval [Cl] 4.2 to 7.4). PCPs spent an average of 11.4 minutes per hour performing simultaneous tasks compared with 6.4 minutes per hour for emergency physicians (average difference, 5.0 minutes; 95% Cl 1.2 to 8.8). Emergency physicians spent an average of 37.5 minutes per hour managing 3 or more patients concurrently compared with 0.9 minutes per hour for PCPs. PCPs spent significantly more time performing direct patient care, and emergency physicians spent significantly more time in analyzing data, charting, and taking reports on patients. Conclusion: Emergency physicians experienced more interruptions and managed more patients concurrently than PCPs. PCPs spent more time performing simultaneous tasks than emergency physicians. Our study suggests there are important ergonomic differences between emergency medicine and office-based primary care work environments that may require different training approaches, design considerations, and coping strategies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)146-151
Number of pages6
JournalAnnals of Emergency Medicine
Volume38
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2001

Fingerprint

Primary Care Physicians
Emergency Medical Services
Workplace
Hospital Emergency Service
Primary Health Care
Emergencies
Physicians
Physicians' Offices
Urbanization
Human Engineering
Emergency Medicine
Community Hospital
Patient Care
Observation
Confidence Intervals

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Work interrupted : A comparison of workplace interruptions in emergency departments and primary care offices. / Chisholm, Carey D.; Dornfeld, Amanda M.; Nelson, David R.; Cordell, William H.

In: Annals of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 38, No. 2, 2001, p. 146-151.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chisholm, Carey D. ; Dornfeld, Amanda M. ; Nelson, David R. ; Cordell, William H. / Work interrupted : A comparison of workplace interruptions in emergency departments and primary care offices. In: Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2001 ; Vol. 38, No. 2. pp. 146-151.
@article{0595a14f35044a8492016fc789e3b1e9,
title = "Work interrupted: A comparison of workplace interruptions in emergency departments and primary care offices",
abstract = "Study objective: We sought to determine the number of interruptions and to characterize tasks performed in emergency departments compared with those performed in primary care offices. Methods: We conducted an observational time-motion, task-analysis study in 5 nonteaching community hospitals and 22 primary care offices in 5 central Indiana cities. Twenty-two emergency physicians and 22 office-based primary care physicians (PCPs) were observed at work. The number of interruptions, tasks, simultaneous tasks, and patients concurrently managed were recorded in 1-minute increments during 150- to 210-minute observation periods. Results: Emergency physicians were interrupted an average of 9.7 times per hour compared with 3.9 times per hour for PCPs, for an average difference of 5.8 times per hour (95{\%} confidence interval [Cl] 4.2 to 7.4). PCPs spent an average of 11.4 minutes per hour performing simultaneous tasks compared with 6.4 minutes per hour for emergency physicians (average difference, 5.0 minutes; 95{\%} Cl 1.2 to 8.8). Emergency physicians spent an average of 37.5 minutes per hour managing 3 or more patients concurrently compared with 0.9 minutes per hour for PCPs. PCPs spent significantly more time performing direct patient care, and emergency physicians spent significantly more time in analyzing data, charting, and taking reports on patients. Conclusion: Emergency physicians experienced more interruptions and managed more patients concurrently than PCPs. PCPs spent more time performing simultaneous tasks than emergency physicians. Our study suggests there are important ergonomic differences between emergency medicine and office-based primary care work environments that may require different training approaches, design considerations, and coping strategies.",
author = "Chisholm, {Carey D.} and Dornfeld, {Amanda M.} and Nelson, {David R.} and Cordell, {William H.}",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1067/mem.2001.115440",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "146--151",
journal = "Annals of Emergency Medicine",
issn = "0196-0644",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Work interrupted

T2 - A comparison of workplace interruptions in emergency departments and primary care offices

AU - Chisholm, Carey D.

AU - Dornfeld, Amanda M.

AU - Nelson, David R.

AU - Cordell, William H.

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Study objective: We sought to determine the number of interruptions and to characterize tasks performed in emergency departments compared with those performed in primary care offices. Methods: We conducted an observational time-motion, task-analysis study in 5 nonteaching community hospitals and 22 primary care offices in 5 central Indiana cities. Twenty-two emergency physicians and 22 office-based primary care physicians (PCPs) were observed at work. The number of interruptions, tasks, simultaneous tasks, and patients concurrently managed were recorded in 1-minute increments during 150- to 210-minute observation periods. Results: Emergency physicians were interrupted an average of 9.7 times per hour compared with 3.9 times per hour for PCPs, for an average difference of 5.8 times per hour (95% confidence interval [Cl] 4.2 to 7.4). PCPs spent an average of 11.4 minutes per hour performing simultaneous tasks compared with 6.4 minutes per hour for emergency physicians (average difference, 5.0 minutes; 95% Cl 1.2 to 8.8). Emergency physicians spent an average of 37.5 minutes per hour managing 3 or more patients concurrently compared with 0.9 minutes per hour for PCPs. PCPs spent significantly more time performing direct patient care, and emergency physicians spent significantly more time in analyzing data, charting, and taking reports on patients. Conclusion: Emergency physicians experienced more interruptions and managed more patients concurrently than PCPs. PCPs spent more time performing simultaneous tasks than emergency physicians. Our study suggests there are important ergonomic differences between emergency medicine and office-based primary care work environments that may require different training approaches, design considerations, and coping strategies.

AB - Study objective: We sought to determine the number of interruptions and to characterize tasks performed in emergency departments compared with those performed in primary care offices. Methods: We conducted an observational time-motion, task-analysis study in 5 nonteaching community hospitals and 22 primary care offices in 5 central Indiana cities. Twenty-two emergency physicians and 22 office-based primary care physicians (PCPs) were observed at work. The number of interruptions, tasks, simultaneous tasks, and patients concurrently managed were recorded in 1-minute increments during 150- to 210-minute observation periods. Results: Emergency physicians were interrupted an average of 9.7 times per hour compared with 3.9 times per hour for PCPs, for an average difference of 5.8 times per hour (95% confidence interval [Cl] 4.2 to 7.4). PCPs spent an average of 11.4 minutes per hour performing simultaneous tasks compared with 6.4 minutes per hour for emergency physicians (average difference, 5.0 minutes; 95% Cl 1.2 to 8.8). Emergency physicians spent an average of 37.5 minutes per hour managing 3 or more patients concurrently compared with 0.9 minutes per hour for PCPs. PCPs spent significantly more time performing direct patient care, and emergency physicians spent significantly more time in analyzing data, charting, and taking reports on patients. Conclusion: Emergency physicians experienced more interruptions and managed more patients concurrently than PCPs. PCPs spent more time performing simultaneous tasks than emergency physicians. Our study suggests there are important ergonomic differences between emergency medicine and office-based primary care work environments that may require different training approaches, design considerations, and coping strategies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034922001&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034922001&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1067/mem.2001.115440

DO - 10.1067/mem.2001.115440

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 146

EP - 151

JO - Annals of Emergency Medicine

JF - Annals of Emergency Medicine

SN - 0196-0644

IS - 2

ER -