Wound infection after colostomy closure for imperforate anus in children

Utility of preoperative oral antibiotics

Francine D. Breckler, Frederick Rescorla, Deborah F. Billmire

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background/Purpose: There is little published data on the efficacy of surgical infection prophylaxis in children. The purpose of this study was to assess wound infection rate in children undergoing colostomy closure for imperforate anus and evaluate the impact of bowel preparation and antibiotics. Methods: Children younger than 18 years with imperforate anus who had a colostomy closure between January 1996 and December 2007 were identified. Data collected included demographics, bowel preparation, antibiotics, operative details, and postoperative infections. Comparison of mechanical bowel preparation and intravenous antibiotics with and without oral antibiotics was compared using χ2 tests. Significance was defined as P < .05. Results: A total of 118 patients were identified. Primary skin closure was done in 97%. Mechanical bowel preparation was used in 93%, intravenous antibiotics in 97%, and oral preoperative antibiotics in 52%. Wound infections occurred in 14% (n = 17). The addition of oral antibiotics to the standard regimen of mechanical bowel preparation with intravenous antibiotics did not alter infection rate (13% versus 17%, P = .64). Conclusion: Wound infection in children undergoing elective colostomy closure for imperforate anus was 14%. Infection rate was not affected by use of oral antibiotics. Future studies may allow specific guideline development for infection prophylaxis in pediatric patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1509-1513
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Pediatric Surgery
Volume45
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 2010

Fingerprint

Imperforate Anus
Colostomy
Wound Infection
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Infection
Demography
Guidelines
Pediatrics

Keywords

  • Bowel preparation
  • Colostomy closure
  • Wound infection

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Wound infection after colostomy closure for imperforate anus in children : Utility of preoperative oral antibiotics. / Breckler, Francine D.; Rescorla, Frederick; Billmire, Deborah F.

In: Journal of Pediatric Surgery, Vol. 45, No. 7, 2010, p. 1509-1513.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0af18aa615734e3b835c599d60237594,
title = "Wound infection after colostomy closure for imperforate anus in children: Utility of preoperative oral antibiotics",
abstract = "Background/Purpose: There is little published data on the efficacy of surgical infection prophylaxis in children. The purpose of this study was to assess wound infection rate in children undergoing colostomy closure for imperforate anus and evaluate the impact of bowel preparation and antibiotics. Methods: Children younger than 18 years with imperforate anus who had a colostomy closure between January 1996 and December 2007 were identified. Data collected included demographics, bowel preparation, antibiotics, operative details, and postoperative infections. Comparison of mechanical bowel preparation and intravenous antibiotics with and without oral antibiotics was compared using χ2 tests. Significance was defined as P < .05. Results: A total of 118 patients were identified. Primary skin closure was done in 97{\%}. Mechanical bowel preparation was used in 93{\%}, intravenous antibiotics in 97{\%}, and oral preoperative antibiotics in 52{\%}. Wound infections occurred in 14{\%} (n = 17). The addition of oral antibiotics to the standard regimen of mechanical bowel preparation with intravenous antibiotics did not alter infection rate (13{\%} versus 17{\%}, P = .64). Conclusion: Wound infection in children undergoing elective colostomy closure for imperforate anus was 14{\%}. Infection rate was not affected by use of oral antibiotics. Future studies may allow specific guideline development for infection prophylaxis in pediatric patients.",
keywords = "Bowel preparation, Colostomy closure, Wound infection",
author = "Breckler, {Francine D.} and Frederick Rescorla and Billmire, {Deborah F.}",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.10.054",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "1509--1513",
journal = "Journal of Pediatric Surgery",
issn = "0022-3468",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Wound infection after colostomy closure for imperforate anus in children

T2 - Utility of preoperative oral antibiotics

AU - Breckler, Francine D.

AU - Rescorla, Frederick

AU - Billmire, Deborah F.

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Background/Purpose: There is little published data on the efficacy of surgical infection prophylaxis in children. The purpose of this study was to assess wound infection rate in children undergoing colostomy closure for imperforate anus and evaluate the impact of bowel preparation and antibiotics. Methods: Children younger than 18 years with imperforate anus who had a colostomy closure between January 1996 and December 2007 were identified. Data collected included demographics, bowel preparation, antibiotics, operative details, and postoperative infections. Comparison of mechanical bowel preparation and intravenous antibiotics with and without oral antibiotics was compared using χ2 tests. Significance was defined as P < .05. Results: A total of 118 patients were identified. Primary skin closure was done in 97%. Mechanical bowel preparation was used in 93%, intravenous antibiotics in 97%, and oral preoperative antibiotics in 52%. Wound infections occurred in 14% (n = 17). The addition of oral antibiotics to the standard regimen of mechanical bowel preparation with intravenous antibiotics did not alter infection rate (13% versus 17%, P = .64). Conclusion: Wound infection in children undergoing elective colostomy closure for imperforate anus was 14%. Infection rate was not affected by use of oral antibiotics. Future studies may allow specific guideline development for infection prophylaxis in pediatric patients.

AB - Background/Purpose: There is little published data on the efficacy of surgical infection prophylaxis in children. The purpose of this study was to assess wound infection rate in children undergoing colostomy closure for imperforate anus and evaluate the impact of bowel preparation and antibiotics. Methods: Children younger than 18 years with imperforate anus who had a colostomy closure between January 1996 and December 2007 were identified. Data collected included demographics, bowel preparation, antibiotics, operative details, and postoperative infections. Comparison of mechanical bowel preparation and intravenous antibiotics with and without oral antibiotics was compared using χ2 tests. Significance was defined as P < .05. Results: A total of 118 patients were identified. Primary skin closure was done in 97%. Mechanical bowel preparation was used in 93%, intravenous antibiotics in 97%, and oral preoperative antibiotics in 52%. Wound infections occurred in 14% (n = 17). The addition of oral antibiotics to the standard regimen of mechanical bowel preparation with intravenous antibiotics did not alter infection rate (13% versus 17%, P = .64). Conclusion: Wound infection in children undergoing elective colostomy closure for imperforate anus was 14%. Infection rate was not affected by use of oral antibiotics. Future studies may allow specific guideline development for infection prophylaxis in pediatric patients.

KW - Bowel preparation

KW - Colostomy closure

KW - Wound infection

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77955639062&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77955639062&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.10.054

DO - 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.10.054

M3 - Article

VL - 45

SP - 1509

EP - 1513

JO - Journal of Pediatric Surgery

JF - Journal of Pediatric Surgery

SN - 0022-3468

IS - 7

ER -